Tag Archives: press

Chicago Underground Film Festival 2026 Award Winners / Every Contact Leaves a Trace

Screen Magazine

01 Oct 2026

The Chicago Underground Film Festival has announced the award winners from its 33rd edition, which concluded Sunday following five days of independent, experimental and underground cinema.

CUFF33 was the festival’s most successful edition in recent years, producing a 20% increase in both attendance and box-office revenue over 2025. The festival presented more than 100 films from 22 countries at the Gene Siskel Film Center and Harper Theater.

At Sunday’s awards ceremony, CUFF also announced that it will begin a new chapter in 2027 by moving to Chicago’s historic Music Box Theatre and returning to its traditional early-summer position on the festival calendar. CUFF34 will take place June 9–13, 2027.

The audience greeted the announcement with cheers.

“This year’s growth confirmed that there is a substantial audience for adventurous filmmaking in Chicago,” said CUFF Programmer and Artistic Director Bryan Wendorf. “CUFF has spent more than three decades building a community around films that take genuine creative risks. Moving to the Music Box gives us an opportunity to build on that history and establish CUFF as a major international destination for independent, experimental and underground cinema.”

2026 Award Winners

CUFF has never regarded filmmaking as a contest. Each year, however, the festival celebrates work that leaves a particular impression. Rather than imposing fixed categories in advance, CUFF invites its jurors to create awards reflecting the films and ideas they encountered within that year’s program.

The 2026 award recipients are:

  • Best Documentary: A Stranger Has No Eyes — C.S. Nicholson
  • Best Essay Film: Every Contact Leaves a Trace — Lynne Sachs
  • Best Archival Exploration: Daria’s Night Flowers — Maryam Tafakory
  • Best Emotional Collapse Film: Placeholder — Jesse McLean
  • Best Environmental Collapse Film: Document With No End — Kym McDaniel
  • Best Artistic Process Collapse Film: Domestic Weights and Measures — Paul Tarragó
  • Made in Chicago Award: Sistas in the Pit — Monet-Chanel Khanyahl
  • Audience Award: Driven — Gabrielle Fitzpatrick and Max Fitzpatrick

2026 Jury

The 2026 jury consisted of Tom Colley, Anahita Ghazvinizadeh and Dirk Matthews.

Tom Colley directs New Channels Initiative, a research and development project addressing changes in nonprofit experimental and independent media distribution. During more than 25 years at Video Data Bank—first as archivist and later as director—he guided its transition from analog distribution to digital collections and educational streaming.

Anahita Ghazvinizadeh is an Iranian-American filmmaker, writer and educator whose work explores personhood, belonging, displacement and outsiderness. Her short film Needle won the Cinefondation First Prize at Cannes, and her debut feature, They, premiered in Cannes’ official selection. Her most recent film, My Life Is Wind (A Letter), premiered at Locarno and has screened internationally, including at the Museum of Modern Art. She is currently an Assistant Professor in Film, Video, New Media and Animation at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.

Dirk Matthews is a practitioner-scholar, filmmaker, photographer and educator who has taught film and the arts for nearly 30 years. Drawing on his experience in clinical practice and arts-based healing, his work examines how creative expression can amplify overlooked voices and build resilience. He currently consults for arts and music colleges, helping creative individuals transition from higher education into sustainable careers. An award-winning architectural photographer, he has also screened films at the Tucson International Film Festival. He is happiest when his day includes coffee and a movie.

A New Home at the Music Box Theatre

Beginning in 2027, CUFF returns to Chicago’s historic, independently operated Music Box Theatre.

Opened in 1929, the Music Box is one of Chicago’s great movie houses and a longtime center for independent, international, repertory and cult cinema. It was ranked No. 9 on Time Out’s list of the 100 greatest cinemas in the world.

The Music Box’s three theaters, lounge and social spaces will give filmmakers and audiences room to move between screenings, conversations and special events throughout the festival.

What Does CUFF Mean by “Underground”?

Underground is not a genre, budget or style.

CUFF looks for films that take risks with form, aesthetics and subject matter—and for filmmakers willing to follow an idea wherever it leads. Experimental, narrative, documentary, animation, hybrid work, essay film, personal cinema, genre deconstruction and expanded media are all welcome. The festival values ambition over category.

If a film takes genuine creative risks—or simply could not have emerged from a studio mandate or streaming algorithm—CUFF is interested.

As Roger Ebert famously wrote of the festival:

“What you get for your money is not just admission to the films but admission to a subculture.”

Cinefile / Every Contact Leaves a Trace

https://www.cinefile.info/

Lynne Sachs’ EVERY CONTACT LEAVES A TRACE (US/Documentary)
Sunday, 2:30pm
I’m not related to Lynne Sachs, though I do know her personally, and one of the things I appreciate about her work is how it feels like an extension of spending time with her. Sachs often shares intimate details of her life in her films, yet she does so in a modest, convivial, and discursive way, as if she were initiating a discussion with the audience rather than simply confessing to them. She also reveals things about herself in order to get her onscreen subjects to do the same, regardless of whether they’re strangers or members of her family. In EVERY CONTACT LEAVES A TRACE, she engages in conversation with both; to find the strangers (or at least people she doesn’t know well), she draws on her collection of the roughly 600 business cards she’s collected over the past four decades and seeks out the contacts whom she thinks will make for compelling presences in her movie. The interviewees range from Sachs’ hairdresser to a forensic scientist to the artist and filmmaker Lawrence Brose, who through no fault of his own spent two years under FBI surveillance. Sachs interweaves these stories eloquently (perhaps not coincidentally, one of the interviewees gives her a lesson in stitching), creating a cinematic tapestry of interesting lives. In between the varied profiles, the filmmaker reflects on how these subjects have affected her, reminding us (as per the title) of how the lives we encounter can mark our own. Sachs doesn’t make a to-do about this; like Agnès Varda’s nonfiction work, EVERY CONTACT LEAVES A TRACE feels informal despite asking big questions. This informality, of course, is deceptive—you’re likely to come away from the film feeling stimulated, compelled to reconsider how each life is a make-up of various others. (2025, 82 min, DCP Digital) [Ben Sachs]

Mystery Catalog / Every Contact Leaves a Trace

https://mysterycatalog.com/2026/04/every-contact-leaves-a-trace-at-anthology-film-archives-may-3/
April 29, 2026
By Herbert Gambill

Brooklyn documentary filmmaker Lynne Sachs is the recipient of the POV Award at the San Francisco Film Festival on April 29. The festival will be screening her latest film, “Every Contact Leaves a Trace.” Go here for more information. On May 3 the film will also be shown at NYC’s Anthology Film Archives.

Sachs has a collection of 600 business cards and decides to choose seven of them and attempt to reconnect with the persons who gave them to her. (Her ramblings while searching for candidates–”Oh, she won’t talk to me!”–is one of the most amusing parts of the film.) She says the premise is a foundation of forensic science invented by Edmond Locard, a forensic pioneer: any trace can link a person to a place, another person or an object. She even has a scientist analyze the cards for fingerprints and DNA. (This doesn’t reveal much.)

In her director’s statement, Sachs reports that “Chance meetings become distinct and revealing punctums, each physical interaction an encounter that pricks.” Punctum was a concept Roland Barthes created for his 1980 book on photography “Camera Lucida.” He distinguished between the “studium” of a photo (the obvious symbolic content of the photo) and its “punctum” (something, perhaps incidental, that “pierces” the viewer in a person way). In her usual technique of hybrid filmmaking, she comes up with a different way to model her interactions with the seven contacts.

One of the most unsettling contacts for her is Lawrence Brose, an experimental film artist whose films explored his gay sexuality, especially his feature-length film “De Profundis,” a hand-etched film inspired by Oscar Wilde’s 1887 letter to his lover from prison. Brose reveals to Sachs that he was charged with having child pornography and she wonders if she should cut him from the film only to learn later that he was innocent: a member of his art collective had downloaded the material and yet he was charged and his lawyer advised him to take a plea deal rather than to go to court.

Sachs met two of the contacts via her presence at various international film festivals over the years. Angela Haardt is a German avant-garde film artist who was born in 1940 and recalls her memories of Nazi Germany, including the continued popularity of 19th century German poet Heinrich Heine, whose work was banned by the Nazis. This prompts Lynne, who is Jewish, to think about the genocide in Gaza.  Jiang Juan, a champion of films by women in China, lives with the director for awhile; Sachs uses striking split screen footage of her to illustrate her perception of her in the past and the present.

Betty Leacraft is a textile artist who lives in Philadelphia. She gently tutors the filmmaker in needlepoint, demonstrating her own method of tying off thread. Actress Rae C. Wright is employed to play a former therapist of Sachs whose advice surprised her. Lynne interviews her niece and nephew (children of her brother, filmmaker Ira Sachs) about her project. They offer her whimsical takes from a younger generation.

Sachs created a way to diagram her interaction with her contacts with white markings on a black background. (It looks a bit like football play diagrams.) One wonders how the film would differ had she chosen other business cards, which makes “Every Contact Leaves a Trace” what Barthes called a “writerly” text, one that forces the viewer to engage actively with the work. You may even want to go to your own collection of business cards and create your own series of experiments. Featuring a great soundtrack by Stephen Vitiello and lovely animation, Lynne Sachs’ latest film is another wonderful addition to her long body of perceptive, funny and warm feminist-informed explorations of creativity, memory, seriality and politics.

Go here to listen to Adam Schartoff’s interview with Sachs about this film.

Screen Slate / Every Contact Leaves a Trace

April 24th 2026
By Delaney Holton
https://www.screenslate.com/articles/every-contact-leaves-trace

Lynne Sachs’s new film Every Contact Leaves a Trace (2025) begins from a pun on Locard’s Exchange Principle: the forensic axiom that each encounter between people or objects deposits a material residue. Sachs turns the principle inward, toward the sedimented matter of a life lived among others: some 600 business cards accumulated over four decades, a paper archive indexing the chance encounters and professional exchanges of an illustrious career. The film appropriately screens on the occasion of Sachs’s Persistence of Vision Award from SFFILM, which recognizes her career in experimental documentary filmmaking.

As Sachs sifts through the stacks, narrating associations or confronting blank spots in her recollection, the cards’ standardized form gives way to the unruliness of relation. Sachs layers a restless flow of images, animations, and superimpositions over a diaristic voiceover, while frequent collaborator Stephen Vitiello’s omnipresent score hums beneath. She stages new encounters with select figures represented in her collection: a textile artist, a therapist, a refugee and mother who once cooked for her. Conversations always seem to turn toward days gone by, though the governing insight is less about recovering evidence of what “really” happened than observing how the past is continually remediated through its recounting and the subtle gravity people exert upon one another’s lives across space and time. At intervals, Sachs extends the interpersonal scale of her inquiry into a more expansive awareness. 

While speaking to the woman who cuts her hair or searching for someone to make her maqluba, she holds Ukraine and Gaza on her mind. As she thinks of previous mistakes, of her ambivalent German-Jewish heritage, or her complicity in historical and current violence while living within the imperial core, her on-screen interlocutors serve as mirrors into her own wandering mind, a gesture toward entanglement reminiscent of Chris Marker’s reflexive Sans Soleil (1983). The “trace,” the film suggests, marks both the fact of contact and the asymmetries that shape it. At the same time, these traces may falter in their own ways, as they fail to hold the fullness of what passes between people. What constitutes intimacy? What does it mean to know someone? Closeness doesn’t necessarily produce understanding or solidarity. It can generate hostility or leave damage. With Sachs, we learn that to be in relation is to come to terms with one’s capacity to do harm and to accept that we might leave imprints that elude our awareness entirely. If Sachs begins from the business cards as her archive of traces, then, by the end she relinquishes the thinness of their description to the irreducible complexity of the people and relationships they represent.

Every Contact Leaves a Trace screens Saturday, May 9, presented by Other Cinema at Artists’s Television Access, with Lynne Sachs in person.

Previously:

Every Contact Leaves a Trace screens Wednesday, April 29, at BAMPFA, with Lynne Sachs in person to receive SFFILM’s Persistence of Vision award.

Screen Anarchy / Every Contact Leaves a Trace

San Francisco 2026 Review: EVERY CONTACT LEAVES A TRACE, Poignant, Thoughtful Cine-Essay

Mel Valentin, Lead Critic; San Francisco, California

https://screenanarchy.com/amp/2026/05/san-francisco-2026-review-every-contact-leaves-a-trace-poignant-thoughtful-cine-essay.html

May 14 2026, 11:02 AM

The latest project by filmmaker Lynne Sachs (Drift and Bough, The Washing Society, Film About a Father Who) opens with a quote from the French-born father of 20th-century forensic science, Dr. Edmond Locard: “Every contact leaves a trace.”

The basis for “Locard’s Exchange Principle,” it also doubles as the title of Sachs’ documentary, a deeply personal cine-essay.

With more time behind her than in front of her, a meditative Sachs uncovered a box of 600 business cards dating back to 1990 and the fall of the Berlin Wall. As a young woman and burgeoning filmmaker, Sachs met Angela Haardt, a Berlin resident, a founding member of the International Forum of the Film Avant-Garde, and the director of a shorts festival (1990-1997) where Sachs placed an early short film of hers. Her new film combines archival footage, reminiscences about post-war Germany, and its place in the Jewish-American imagination (more positive than negative for Sachs, the opposite understandably so for her mother)

Decades later, Haardt welcomes Sachs both as an equal and a long-lost friend. Looking back at their initial meeting, the intervening time, and the present, Haardt grapples with German history, identity, and culture, specifically how, when, and where Germans commemorate the Holocaust or deliberately forget it. It’s a tragedy that Sachs connects to her own conflicted, contradictory feelings about Israel, Gaza, and Israel’s initially defensive response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, including the reoccupation of Gaza and the disproportionate effect on the Palestinian population.

Before Every Contact Leaves a Trace ventures too far into Israel, Gaza, or the commingled future of its peoples and the region itself, however, Sachs deliberately pulls back, returning to the original focus of her project, tracking down a select handful from the business cards she acquired over the years. Few are as compelling as Haardt, but they’re still fascinating on their own, sometimes less because of who they are or what they’ve contributed to film and the film community than their relationship to Sachs and the latter’s attempts, sometimes successful, sometimes not, to reignite long-dormant friendships or relationships.

Among Every Contact Leaves a Trace’s subjects, Sachs’ most intriguing interviewees include the late Lawrence Brose (De Profundis), a pioneering queer filmmaker who found himself hounded by Homeland Security and ICE for the alleged possession of child pornography. Out of a combination of fear and prudence, Brose pled guilty to a lesser offense (obscenity), in exchange for two years of probation. During that period, Brose couldn’t own or access anything related to the LGBTQ community or risk his probation turning into imprisonment.

Brose’s persecution and subsequent plea deal could — and probably should — have been a documentary in its own right, but in Sachs’ cine-essay, it offers her another opportunity for self-examination, both as an individual and as a filmmaker bound by ethics. Given the seriousness of the accusations against Brose, she considered excising his segment altogether. It’s to her credit that she didn’t.

Even in a truncated form, Brose and his story needed to be heard and seen. Sachs’ ethical conundrum also serves as an opening for much-needed discussion and rumination on the other side of the screen.

Sachs’ other subjects include Juan Jiang, the director of the now-defunct Chinese Women’s Festival; textile artist Betty Leacraft, Sachs’ one-time student turned teacher; Felix and Viva Torres, Sachs’ nephew and niece, respectively (the children of Sachs’ filmmaker brother, Ira); and, in a meta-fictional twist, Rae C. Wright, a performer who serves as a stand-in for Sachs’ therapist. While Leacraft proves slightly prickly under Sachs’ performance-driven direction, Felix and Viva emerge as a charming duo, offering the occasional insight along with warmth of spirit and generosity toward their idiosyncratic aunt. 

For some, Every Contact Leaves a Trace will seem overly personal and thus, too slight or of marginal interest. For those willing to look — and just as importantly, listen — Every Contact Leaves a Trace will, like the title of Sachs’ documentary, leave an indelible mark, asking important, open-ended questions about life, art, and mortality. Few have answers, but as Sachs suggests more than once, they’re all the more worth asking. 

Every Contact Leaves a Trace premiered at the 2025 IDFA (International Documentary Film Festival) in Amsterdam. It played most recently at the 2026 San Francisco International Film Festival. 

The Film Stage / Prismatic Ground 2026

Prismatic Ground 2026 Forges a Vibrant, Accessible Path for Film Festivals

Soham Gadre
April 28, 2026
https://thefilmstage.com/prismatic-ground-2026-forges-a-vibrant-accessible-path-for-film-festivals/

Prismatic Ground is a film festival I have been attending in-person for nearly three years, and while my streak of such attendance unfortunately ended this year, I have continued to watch and cover since its inaugural edition in 2021. Prismatic Ground remains so special because it maintains the tenets of its conception, which founder and director Inney Prakash explained as an attempt to fill the void of festivals dedicated to experimental cinema and a festival that doesn’t treat the COVID pandemic’s shift to online-accessible film-viewing as merely a “stopgap,” but an actual “effort to rethink the experience” of a festival.

The radical shift and change to the festival circuit for both cinema viewers and filmmakers—which includes actually paying the filmmakers for their work to be presented and removing geo-blocking so as many people as possible who can’t attend in-person screenings can still see some films online from anywhere—ties nicely to this year’s closing film, Isiah Medina’s Gangsterism. Always a self-assured and divisive artist, especially post-Inventing the Future, Medina, in his latest, is both his most combative and self-reflexive. Gangsterism is combative for how it seems to deconstruct the criticisms leveled at Medina’s previous films, such as their supposed obtuseness or the heavily academic framework for theorizing things like theft of art and liberation of technology that seems removed from material reality. Its self-reflection emerges from a major topic of discussion: that the central character, Clem, considers it insulting that potential financiers find his movies difficult to understand. Medina’s style is as distinct as ever. The patterns of repetition, sound, and image interrupting each other are contrasted through drawn-out sequences of characters forming arguments on the current economy of cinema, the financing of being a filmmaker, the social responsibilities and roles of academia, and, central to its plot, the proliferation of film via digital piracy.

The festival gives out only one prize per year: the Ground Glass prize, a career-achievement award. In its inaugural year, it went to Brooklyn-based artist Lynne Sachs, and this year it went to Japanese experimental artist Kohei Ando. Sachs also has a film this year, Every Contact Leaves a Trace, which pairs well with Ando’s work. Sachs’ film is a self-insert documentary where the filmmaker looks back to remember and re-encounter people with whom she shared and kept business cards. These encounters vary from friendly to awkward to uncomfortable, both in the memories they bring back and the inherent ideas that shoving a camera into someone’s face might elicit. Considerations of “performance,” “simulation,” and “vulnerability” seep into the forefront through the lens. Sachs considers aloud, while shuffling through the business cards, which of these people would be welcoming to meeting her again. A German festival director named Angela, whom Sachs met 30 years ago, recounts post-war Germany and the history of the Holocaust in people’s collective memory as another genocide in Gaza is unfolding today. Experimental filmmaker Lawrence Brose speaks about the persecution he faced as a gay artist while scenes from his film play in montage over conversation.

Like Sachs’ film, Kohei Ando’s cinema is very much tussling with ideas of time, memory, and connection to people. The most direct work that mirrors Sachs is the fun short My Friends in My Address Book, which goes through a montage of Ando’s friends smiling for the camera and holding up pieces of paper with their names. Other shorts, like his Passing Train series, exhibit time as something continuous and through multiple angles—intimate and unrelenting rather than something that creates distance. There is a sense of sentimentality that warmly lingers throughout these movies—especially On the Far Side of Twilight, which uses a saccharine piano score and cute narration that highlights his memories from childhood to old age. The image composition is immaculate, distinct in its bright coloration, and imaginative for how it breaks the fourth wall of the film plane, burning it, cutting it out, and transforming it into various shapes while moving it at different speeds.

It’s worth highlighting a number of shorts that bring forth examination and consideration for where experimental cinema is today. Rajee Samarasinghe’s A Flower Falling Back Into the Earth comprises excerpts and outtakes from the filmmaker’s remarkable feature documentary Your Touch Makes Others Invisible on missing children in Sri Lanka. The recontextualization of these outtakes from interviews—many of which feature the imperfections of sound, framing, and focus—confront us with how the difficult and traumatic experiences of real people cannot be decontextualized from the filmmaking process. Eislow Johnson’s Injured? is the most “action-packed” and funny of the shorts—a rapid-fire montage of a drive on a highway focusing on the litany of billboards for law firms for car accidents. It is ironic in its clear connection between America’s obsession with cars and suing people, but also fashioned as a sort of intense action film, mimicking the volume and ferocity of one of cinema’s great entertainments: the high-speed chase.

Yusuf Demiror’s Archura Leaves the City Forever is a beautiful, hypnotic fable. Its warm lighting and cold urban exteriors, mixed with fantastical costumes and lush natural highlights, make for a transportive work reminiscent of a mix between Jim Jarmusch’s Permanent Vacation and Nobuhiko Obayashi’s Emotion. Michael Barwise’s That Sanity Be Kept is a melancholy and nostalgic film, but also terrifyingly contemporary in its depiction of surveillance and the destruction of privacy as government agencies track the movements, faces, and clothing of various young people during a ceasefire amidst The Troubles.

Finally, three phenomenal and rare treasures by Iraqi filmmaker Parine Jaddo––Atash, Aisha, and Teyh––all highlight the artist’s conflicts (or false conflicts) of sexuality with religion, and modern discourses of fiction and the roles of men and women in Iraqi society in a rapidly westernizing world. All this occurs amid constant reminders of bombs and how post-war existence for the Middle East is always a pre-war state.

Primastic Ground 2026 takes place April 29-May 3 in venues across NYC.

Don’t Ask Me for a Release: The Challenge of Depicting Real Lives in Film

Lynne Sachs, who this week will be presented the Persistence of Vision Award, on making her new film Every Contact Leaves a Trace.

By Lynne Sachs | April 28, 2026
https://www.talkhouse.com/dont-ask-me-for-a-release-the-challenge-of-depicting-real-lives-in-film/

Trying to capture reality in my work means dealing with other people’s lives. Sometimes I yearn for something else, less interpersonal. I have a dear friend who’s been making films almost as long as I have. A few weeks ago, I started to vent (or dare I say hyperventilate?) with him about all the complex relationships that have emerged from my particular filmmaking practice. He said he understood completely, and that he’d decided to now only make archival films, no living people involved. The emotional toll was just too much.

Perhaps it would be better to bring people into my films through a more contractual or transparent arrangement where everything was laid out clearly. Then the people in front of my camera would have clear-cut roles. They could anticipate what I would be saying and how they were going to respond. This way, there might be fewer regrets, less instances of someone saying something they wished they hadn’t.

About 10 years ago, I started to ask people to sign film releases that would ostensibly clarify all of the potential problems that might arise. I try to convince myself that I am doing my professional best to acknowledge the rights of the person who signed on the proverbial dotted line, and theoretically, such documents also protect me. Unfortunately, their existence does nothing to relieve my anxiety, as asking people to “perform their lives” in front of my camera necessitates creating a fraught, sometimes unresolved arrangement that I find deeply intimidating.

Facing these haunting dynamics was fundamental to my impulse to make my latest feature, Every Contact Leaves a Trace, an essay film that examines the nature of all sorts of fleeting relationships I’ve had over the course of life. For the past 40 years, I’ve collected business cards given to me by strangers. Now in this digital era, these names, numbers and addresses, stored in a box in my house, have taken on an uncanny resonance. The first step in this 10-year filmmaking journey involved choosing seven cards out of the hundreds. I needed to find out why meeting the people who gave them to me had left such an imprint on my consciousness.

Before I committed to using this cache of cards, I grappled with their legacy as material objects. I learned that the standard size for a business card is 3.5 inches by 2 inches; almost every card is the same, in this way. It’s the people “behind” the cards who are so distinct. I also learned as much as I could about the social provenance of the cards themselves. In Japan, for example, the manner by which a recipient (me!) treats the presenter’s card is indicative of how the recipient will treat the presenter. Actions such as folding the card, or placing the card in one’s back pocket are considered disrespectful. Perhaps how I “treated” the card could tell me something about my relationship to its original owner.

For me, the cards were simply a jumping off point for thinking about what French theorists Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari envisioned as “the body without organs,” a swirling storm of psychic energy that creates an affect that I could not ignore. What I wanted to explore was how these cards illuminated and obscured the essence of a human being – semiotically and interpersonally. I was deeply interested in working with the trajectories that transpired between us, both in our initial meetings and later, far later, as I restaged our interactions in my memory.

Each of the cards presented something challenging – an awkwardness or ambivalence that forced me to think more deeply about documentary subjects, participants, informants … or whatever term you might use to refer to the people in front of the camera. The messier the production of the film became, the more I learned about the process.

Here are a few of the people who “made the cut”:

A retired German film festival programmer. While I am filming with her, this woman – born in the early 1940s – recounts the war she experienced and somehow misunderstood as a child. In our recorded conversation, she remembers, “The Jewish girls one day weren’t there any longer. You didn’t see the action, but you saw the results. How is that possible?” Now more than three quarters of a century after the end of World War II, our conversation opens up my own thinking, as an American Jew, about the genocide in Gaza today. Reckoning with these issues in my own life as I make public my own criticisms of the Israeli government adds another layer to my professional interactions with German film organizations. I worry for almost a year about how my friend will feel about being in a film that makes clear my own politics.

A gay artist who faced censorship and persecution from Homeland Security during and after a specious and controversial conviction for having child pornography in his computer. I ask myself if I should reach out to someone I met more than 30 years ago who was involved in such a fraught situation. In making documentary films, does establishing a commitment to a subject necessarily announce our positionality? I wonder if I need to know the truth about what actually happened. I wonder if it matters. After an extensive period of indecision, my own internal confusion forces me to seek him out for a conversation and perhaps a filmmaking relationship. What happens is beyond what I could ever have imagined. We spend more than a year in constant conversation, developing an interwoven series of scenes that articulate his painful story. Through my work with my editor Emily Packer, we develop a story that parallels Oscar Wilde’s 1895 conviction for sodomy, his banishment to a work camp, and his early death. All of this comes through in my voiceover, uncomfortably and, I hope, with transparence.

A Syrian chef and mother I met on a documentary film set. I make a date to shoot with her, but she cancels just hours before our appointment. She tells me that there was an emergency and that she needed to go to Michigan right away. I am not interested in the truth, but rather the fact that she has taken control. Something tells me that she is not scared of me per se, but of what I would extract from her through the apparatus of the camera. Extraction has become the geological trope for something we all do in documentary films. Her refusal to engage with my camera forces me to think about the inherent power imbalance between a director and her subject. Ultimately, her only presence in the film comes through when I cook a traditional Syrian dinner and “think out loud,” through voice-over narration, about her absence. Her existence is only articulated in the minds of my audience, never before their eyes.

A former therapist whose advice changed my life. For two years, I look for her and fail. Luckily, my enthusiasm for hybrid cinematic inventions provides the opportunity to create a kind of speculative staging of what could have happened but never did. Once I realize that the search for my subject is not as intriguing to me as the staging of it in my imagination, I release myself to an extraordinarily generative interaction with a New York City actress who takes on the challenge of becoming my long-lost therapist. We spend a summer role-playing and filming our evolving discoveries of each other. I am working with an actress, and there is no need for her to reveal anything real about herself. Our interactions are closer to those of a narrative film. The social contract is clear.

In her book Suite for Barbara Loden, author Nathalie Léger wonders if she really wants to learn anything about Loden, the beloved and complicated actor-director of Wanda: “I find myself wavering between wanting to know nothing and wanting to know everything, writing only on condition that I know nothing, or writing only on condition that I omit nothing.” Reading these words from one of the most introspective and uncanny film writers I have ever encountered supports my desire to be released from the rigidity of the documentary paradigm. I take a fluid, hybrid approach to the making of my films and allow myself to confront the two extremes of my practice as an artist. I embrace the uncompromising strictures of the real and the unformed, ever-expanding space of the imagined.

Screen Slate / Prismatic Ground Year 6

Prismatic Ground 2026

Series Spotlight
https://www.screenslate.com/articles/prismatic-ground-2026
April 28th 2026
By Kathleen Langjahr

Tomorrow night at BAM Rose Cinemas, Ka Ki Wong’s I Heard That They Are Not Going to See Each Other Anymore (2026) will initiate the first wave of programming for the sixth edition of Prismatic Ground. Following the romantic misadventures of two couples across Taipei, the film’s dreamy sequences are punctuated by a vivid orange pincushion flower, which one of the protagonists, Melih, receives from his object of affection, the alcoholic Yu-Ping. Melih owns a noodle shop frequented by the eccentric Tao, whose infatuation with Shin drives her to physical antagonism, including stalking him and sending gangs to beat him up in cartoonish fight sequences. We intermittently view the lovers through the POV of Melih’s flower, which becomes a metaphor for longing and memory as both he and Tao grapple with their doomed romances in yearning monologues interspersed with listless wanderings across the city and its surrounding ruins.

Wong’s film will be followed by Nicolás Pereda’s Cobre (2025), an enigmatic portrait of Lázaro, a worker at a copper mine in a remote region of Mexico who stumbles upon a dead body on his way to work one day. Already on bad terms with the mine’s management for seeking sick leave for a respiratory illness contested by the mine’s on-staff doctor, Lázaro is closest to his aunt, who supports his recovery while he struggles to maintain his health and innocence. Conducive to suggestions of intrigue and desire, Cobre explores the limits of trust in the relationship between viewer, filmmaker, and protagonist.

Prismatic Ground is a film festival curated by Inney Prakash that showcases experimental works in short and feature formats. Grounded in a postcolonial perspective, the festival provides a space for a diverse range of filmmakers to exhibit their work, which ranges from technically innovative structuralist works, to dramatic features, to historically resonant documentarian efforts. This year’s selection includes a focus on avant-garde works from Asia and celebrations of queer life from across the globe. As with past iterations of the festival, a common invocation across films of wildly differing approaches and subjects is the fight for Palestinian liberation from the American-backed occupation by Israel. Further highlights include a celebration of June Givanni’s Pan-African Cinema Archive in conjunction with the launch of Onyeka Igwe’s book on Givanni at Anthology Film Archives, which will be followed by an evening of poetry and film curated by Shiv Kotecha and Courtney Stephens. Anthology will also host the festival’s presentation of the Ground Glass Award, which recognizes outstanding contributions to the field of experimental media, to Kohei Ando alongside a screening of six of his films.

“A mandala for opening the மனசு (manasu meaning heart and mind in Tamil) to the frequency of love in revolt” is the subtitle to Karthik Pandian’s Surrendur (2026), a vertiginous montage of footage documenting the political upheavals of 2020 in Minnesota, including the toppling of a Christopher Columbus statue orchestrated by American Indian Movement activist Mike Forcia (Bad River Anishinaabe). Forcia serves as a guide through the film’s interwoven networks of people and actions related to the George Floyd Uprising, the Anishinaabe Seven Fires Prophecy, and the Dakota 38+2 Memorial Ride. A recurring formal motif in Surrendur is a circle centered in the square of the frame, embodying the awakening to the colonial violence of American life experienced by so many in that period, including Ta Pe’juta Wičháȟpi Win (Hunkpati Dakota Oyate), whose political consciousness was sparked as she danced around the fallen statue of Columbus. At one point Forcia describes a fiber optic cable connected to our third eye, through which the light of a future free of the imperialist project in which we currently live may reach us, if only we can get on its wavelength.

The American Midwest is also the setting for Eislow Johnson’s short film Injured? (2026), which celebrates the fiftieth anniversary of attorney ads being legalized by looking to the future of American grift: manifestation influencers, numerology divinationists, and proprietors of the Marvel cinematic universe. The shorts in this year’s festival constitute some of the most powerful moments of its lineup, such as Anthony Banua-Simon’s WORLD ENTERPRISES (2026), a collage film composed of excerpts from the films available via mail-order from the distributor World Enterprises that were screened in 1940 for the workers of the Kekaha Sugar Company in O’ahu on their days off. Presented at an inflection point in the labor movement led by Filipino immigrant workers, the films depict the American settler project as an inevitable result of forward progress. Through Banua-Simon’s reconfiguration, the films reveal the cracks in the façade of capitalist omnipresence and the power of community-based political action.

Among the rich selection of films exploring queer life and history is the visually and audibly stunning Joy Boy: A Tribute to Julius Eastman (2026) by the Collectif Faire-Part. Divided into four distinct sequences, the film embodies the revolutionary nature of Eastman’s music in form and concept. Angelo Madsen’s My Structuralist Film (2026) is a smart reinvention of the genre suited to the exploration of the trials of trans visibility and disclosure within the body politic.

In the final wave of programming, Lynne Sach’s Every Contact Leaves a Trace (2025) presents a feature-length essay documentary structured by her investigation into seven people selected from the expansive collection of business cards she has accumulated over the last 40 years. What begins as an investigation into the impact of each encounter on the trajectory of both peoples’ lives eventually opens onto the legacies of broader geopolitical developments and the subjective nature of memory, both personal and collective. The festival concludes with a standout group of Chinese avant-garde shorts curated by Tone Glow, including Branches from Concrete (2026) by Zhou Zhenyu, a film shot in an abandoned shopping complex in the filmmaker’s hometown of Hengshui that has been taken over by nature and local residents who have repurposed certain spaces for community activities. Following the movement of gleaming humanoid metallic beings throughout the structure, the film’s juxtaposition of technology and ruin feels quite apt for our present age.

Prismatic Ground runs April 29-May 3 across BAM, DCTV, Anthology Film Archives, Light Industry, Metrograph, and online with wave ∞, a virtual selection free to watch at prismaticground.com.

5 Films to See at the 2026 Maryland Film Festival

Written by: Christopher Llewellyn Reed | April 7th, 2026

https://filmfestivaltoday.com/fft-festival-coverage/5-films-to-see-at-the-2026-maryland-film-festival

It’s April and the Maryland Film Festival (MdFF) is back, just five months after its last iteration, running April 8-12. This is time of year when the fest has traditionally been held (more or less), so in a world of rapid change, some things are returning to normal. As always, the programming is strong, with shorts, features, and immersive art experiences on offer for a variety of tastes. All information about all screenings (and how to get tickets) is available on the MdFF website. Below, I offer my recommendations of five films to see.

Barbara Forever (Brydie O’Connor, 2026) [excerpted from my Hammer to Nail review out of Sundance]

The late, great experimental, queer filmmaker Barbara Hammer (1939-2019) left behind a treasure trove of work worthy not only of exhibition but of preservation. This is exactly how Brydie O’Connor’s documentary Barbara Forever begins, in a museum—Yale University’s Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, where the films and other material now reside—as Hammer’s life partner, Florrie Burke, pays a visit to commune with old friends. From there, we proceed on a comprehensive journey through the life and career of a seminal artist.

Bouchra (Orian Yani Barki/Meriem Bennani)

An animated drama about a queer Moroccan woman living in Brooklyn, with flashbacks to the homeland interspersed throughout the present, Bouchra—the title character of which is portrayed as a canid and voiced by co-director Meriem Bennani—presents a colorful world full of vibrant characters. The semi-autobiographical story centers on self-actualization and combines real archival footage of Casablanca, phone conversations with an actress standing in for Bennani’s actual mother, and vivid images (where everyone is a different kind of animal) that propel the coming-out narrative forwards. If ultimately we have seen this kind of intricate personal piece before, we have not seen done in exactly this kind of way.

Every Contact Leaves a Trace (Lynne Sachs)

Continuing the personal and experimental theme of the festival, Lynne Sachs’ Every Contact Leaves a Tracefollows the director as she works her way through old business cards to explore the way that people’s lives intersect and then drift apart. She bases her ideas on Dr. Edmond Locard’s “exchange principle”—the foundation of all modern forensic science—which states: “Trace evidence can be used to link people or objects to places, other people, or other objects. It often serves as a starting point for a line of investigation.” And so this intriguing, sometimes oblique, movie goes, Sachs (Film About a Father Who) acting as our guide through an exploration of the resonance of meetings, no matter how fleeting.

House (Nobuhiko Obayashi)

Japanese director Nobuhiko Obayashi’s 1977 experimental horror film was apparently originally inspired by the 1975 American film Jaws, though you would never guess that just by watching it. A group of young women travel for what they think is a weekend getaway to the home of one friend’s aunt … except that the aunt is actually a malevolent spirit bent on eating all of them. Filled with wild and giddy images and music, the movie is a must-see for genre fans and anyone looking to have their mind blown. The MdFF always screens a few revivals, and if you haven’t yet watched this one, be sure to check it out Friday night.

Ugly Cry (Emily Robinson) [excerpted from my Hammer to Nail review out of SXSW]

In her first feature, Ugly Cry, writer/director/star Emily Robinson delivers a compelling meditation on how the harsh gaze—male, female, and even one’s own—within cinematic systems built on exploitation inevitably leads to terrible outcomes. A young actress who should be focusing on performance instead becomes obsessed with making her face show as little actual emotion as possible. You wouldn’t want to scare people with the ugliness of real pain, now, would you?