A tornado is a spinning cyclone of nature. It stampedes like an angry bull through a tranquil pasture of blue violets and upright blades of grass. A tornado kills with abandon but has no will. Lynne Sachs’ “TORNADO” is a poetic piece shot from the perspective of Brooklyn, where much of the paper and soot from the burning towers fell on September 11. Sachs’ fingers obsessively handle these singed fragments of resumes, architectural drawings and calendars, normally banal office material that takes on a new, haunting meaning.
This film is currently only available with a password. Please write to info@lynnesachs.com to request access.
“Photograph of Wind”
by Lynne Sachs 16mm, b&w and color, 4 min. 2001
My daughter’s name is Maya. I’ve been told that the word maya means illusion in Hindu philosophy. As I watch her growing up, spinning like a top around me, I realize that her childhood is not something I can grasp but rather – like the wind – something I feel tenderly brushing across my cheek.
“Sachs suspends in time a single moment of her daughter.” Fred Camper, Chicago Reader
San Francisco Film Festival, Onion City Film Festival
Investigation of a Flame: A Portrait of the Catonsville Nine by Lynne Sachs
45 min. color and B&W, 2001
plus 5 min. Sundance Channel documentary on Daniel Berrigan and the making of the film
On May 17, 1968 nine Vietnam War protesters led by Daniel and Philip Berrigan, walked into a Catonsville, Maryland draft board office, grabbed hundreds of selective service records and burned them with homemade napalm.
“Investigation of a Flame” is an intimate, experimental documentary portrait of the Catonsville Nine, this disparate band of resisters who chose to break the law in a defiant, poetic act of civil disobedience.
How did the photos, trial publicity and news of the two year prison sentences help to galvanize a disillusioned American public? “Investigation of a Flame” explores this politically and religiously motivated performance of the 1960’s in the context of extremely different times — times in which critics of Middle East peace agreements, abortion and technology resort to violence of the most random and sanguine kind in order to access the public imagination.
“BEST DOCUMENTARY in 2001”, Phillip Lopate, Village Voice Critic
“One of the ten best films released in 2002” Phillip Lopate, Film Comment
“A complex rumination on the power of protest…..the trauma of the past, the continued mistakes of the present and the necessity to reflect actively on our government’s wartime antics.” The LA Weekly
“A film to rave about, as well as reckon with.” The Independent Film and Video Monthly
“Sachs’ elegant, elliptical documentary visits with surviving members of what became known as the Catonsville Nine, humble architects of this purposeful yet scathingly metaphoric act of civil disobedience.” The Village Voice
“Investigation of a Flame captures the heartfelt belief behind the Nine’s symbolic action of civil disobedience that sparked other (actions) like it across the nation. (The film) provides a potent reminder that some Americans are willing to pay a heavy price to promote peace.” Baltimore City Paper
“This is a documentary about the protest events that made Catonsville, Maryland, an unpretentious suburb on the cusp of Baltimore, a flash point for citizens’ resistance at the height of the war. Sachs found assorted characters still firm to fiery on the topic. She came to admire the consistency of the mutual antagonists in an argument that still rages (today).” The New York Times
“This poetic essay offers the perfect antidote to PBS: there is no omniscient narrator talking down to the viewer, reciting facts and explaining what to think, yet the story is perfectly clear. Brothers Phil and Dan Berrigan, who led the protest, appear both in the present and in archival footage, a mix that makes their commitment palpable.” Chicago Reader
“To those who think that everything in a society and its culture must move in lock step at times of crisis, (this film) might seem to be ‘off-message.’ But it’s in essence patriotic… saluting U.S. democracy as it pays homage to the U.S. tradition of dissent.” The Baltimore Sun
Screenings: National Broadcast on the Sundance Channel; Maryland Film Festival “Opening Night”; Museum of Modern Art, Documentary Fortnight “Opening Night”; Rhode Island Film Festival; Art Institute of Chicago; Mill Valley Film Festival; San Francisco Cinematheque; Pacific Film Archive; Corcoran Gallery, Washington, D.C.; Olympia Film Festival., Providence Women’s Film Festival, Denver Film Festival; Harvard University Film Archive; Cornell University Cinema; Museum of Fine Arts Boston; NY Underground Film Festival; Vassar College; Ithaca College; Massachusetts College of Art; Catholic University; Maine Film Festival; Florida Film Festival; Georgetown University; Brooklyn Academy of Music, Portland Doc. Festival, Wisconsin Film Festival, Georgetown University’s Jesuit Week, American University Center for Social Media
Awards: Black Maria Film Festival; San Francisco International Film Festival: New Jersey Film Festival; Ann Arbor Film Festival; First Prize Documentary Athens Film Festival
Supported with funding from the Maryland Humanities Council, the Maryland State Council on the Arts, the Puffin Foundation and a Media Arts fellowship from the Rockefeller Foundation.
When was the last time you heard yourself think? Probably not on the way to work Friday; you were playing the radio and returning a few phone calls. Probably not at dinner last night, either. Remember? You watched CNN while you ate. Probably not the last time you visited a museum: You listened to an audio-guide while gazing at the art.
Lynne Sachs, a 39-year-old experimental filmmaker, has created an exhibit with special resonance for people in the era of multi-tasking. Her School 33 video installation, “Horror Vacui: Nature Abhors a Vacuum,” makes us ponder why we seek constantly to fill our minds with words, music, clatter, stuff.
Sachs thinks of film as painting. She painted, drew and wrote poetry as a teen-ager in Memphis, Tenn. But it was not until she was a history major at Brown University — and spent a year studying in Paris — that she discovered film as an art form. “When I found out people could use film in the same way as a paint brush, it just blew my mind,” says Sachs, who for three years has lived in Catonsville with her partner Mark Street, an associate professor in film at the University of Maryland Baltimore County. “I discovered the idea of being a ‘filmmaker,’ that it wasn’t about a crew and a director and a hierarchy of people.”
The artist’s work has appeared at the Museum of Modern Art and the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York and at the Delaware Museum of Art in Wilmington and has won awards at the New Jersey Film Festival, the Athens (Ohio) Film Festival, and the New York Film Expo.
Now Sachs, who this fall is teaching a video class at the Maryland Institute, College of Art, is working on a documentary, funded in part by the Maryland Humanities Council, about the Catonsville Nine, a pioneering group of protesters against the Vietnam War in 1968 came to be called.
Since 1998, when she began the project, she has been haunted, she says, by the story of Catholic priests Philip and Daniel Berrigan, who with seven other people went into a Catonsville draft board office, removed records and burned them in front of a crowd of reporters and onlookers. They were convicted and sentenced to prison.
When not working on the documentary, Sachs shoots other images incessantly, saving them, sometimes for years, until they begin to form patterns in her mind. “The idea for this installation didn’t evolve at once,” she says. “Part of being an experimental filmmaker is that you shoot all the time. It’s like a painting: You don’t know where you are going.”
A meaningful phrase
She heard the term “horror vacui” for the first time about a year ago. “It means fear of emptiness, or a compulsion to fill,” she says. The notion struck a chord.
“I wondered about my own restlessness. As an artist you have this compulsion to create all the time. And I wondered about being able to live with my own thoughts. I heard the words and I looked at this work I had been collecting and I realized this is something that I had been thinking about for almost a decade.”
Sachs has created a deceptively simple installation at School 33. Step behind a heavy black curtain and into a small, dimly lighted bedroom. At first glance, the installation seems to consist only of a bedroom and three ever-changing videos. Stay awhile. You will discover that a great deal is happening, some of it inside your own mind.
The walls and ceiling are white; the floor, gray. A four-poster bed sits in front of a window. The bed’s white sheets and coverlet are turned down — ready for someone to retire for the night. Two chairs painted ghostly gray line the wall.
As you soak up your surroundings with its soft lighting, constantly moving images and shadows that flicker against the sparse furnishings — your mind wanders. On-screen images of ordinary household objects seem weirdly evocative. A duster complete with a bushy top of feathers begins to resemble a palm tree. A siren can be heard. Is that part of the installation, or the muffled sounds of real Baltimore?
Just what is real?
Sachs plays with this question: real or unreal? You are inside the white bedroom, shut away from the “real” world, yet everything here — bed, chairs, television set — is entirely familiar one minute and peculiar the next. You can look out the window, but it is really a video screen.
Through the window, an image appears of the artist performing mundane household activities: sweeping the floor, talking on the telephone, reading a newspaper, washing a window. Peer through this “window” to a point beyond her and you see an image of tree branches dancing in the breezes of a sunny summer day.
Sachs plays the role of producer, camera operator and actor. She filmed herself while watching her image on a monitor, choreographing her movements in reaction to the play of light and shadow and line. “I could watch myself as I did it so, just like when you are painting, you can change the paint or the brushstrokes, I was moving my body for graphic effect,” she says. “It is going back to still lifes. That is how I set it up.”
There also is an image above the real bed: that of a large, white bed. On one pillow, a crimson azalea flickers like a fragment of a dream. This image, the artist says, is “all about the lushness of the flowers, desire, and the empty pillow next to you.”
At the foot of the real bed, a small television sits atop a table. The black-and-white scenes on its screen have the eerie familiar / frightening qualities of film noir. With her camera, Sachs allows you to glimpse a lamp and its shadow, the edge of a telephone, the silhouette of a person reading a newspaper. Light and shadow change the arrangements of ordinary objects into painterly compositions.
The longer you stand inside the installation, the more you see, or think you see. Stare at the sheets of either of the beds — the one you can touch or the image of the bed on the wall — and you begin to notice how the light plays on the wrinkles in the sheets, or how shadows seem to form shapes on the pillow. A dialogue occurs between images. You occasionally see the artist reading a newspaper in the window as the shadow of a person reading a newspaper appears on the smaller television screen. “At times, these images are about specific things,” says Sachs. “At other times they are really about textures and light.”
No sounds of silence
Sound plays a role, too. As the images flicker, you hear crickets chirping, rain falling, cheerful voices, a pop song — noises that can be heard on a Baltimore summer evening. Sachs gives each sound equal weight: “It is as though the thunder has the same value as a pop song and as a child crying. It is more about the play between the sounds than the sounds themselves.”
Percussive sounds, created by Baltimore composer and musician Tom Goldstein, are woven into the sound track. Goldstein watched the window video several times, adding sounds, one by one, that correspond to particular gestures. Sachs says, “The piece has several layers of sound and yet it is really spare, which I really wanted. That was the challenge: To find real world sounds and sounds that are musical that work.”
But the magic of the installation occurs in the moments between these sounds. “The sounds in your head happen when there is no sound,” the artist says. “I would love it if someone sat down for awhile to think about the installation. I would love it if someone would lie down on the bed and just think.”
What would happen if you put down your newspaper right now and listened? You hear the rustle of paper, the clink of a coffee mug being placed on the kitchen table, a siren in the distance, the happy shrieks of a child next door, the rush of a shower running upstairs, the thump of a dog’s tail on the floor, the hum of a refrigerator, your breath.
“Horror Vacui” is on display at School 33, 1427 Light St. in Federal Hill, through Oct. 6. Call 410-396-4641 for hours.
Putting Clutter to Rest
Baltimore Sun, Sept. 24, 2000
Using a camera as her paintbush, Lynne Sachs has created a place to quietly confront our need for constant clamor.
By Holly Selby
When was the last time you heard yourself think?
Probably not on the way to work Friday; you were playing the radio and returning a few phone calls. Probably not at dinner last night, either. Remember? You watched CNN while you ate. Probably not the last time you visited a museum: You listened to an audio-guide while gazing at the art.
Lynne Sachs, a 39-year-old experimental filmmaker, has created an exhibit with special resonance for people in the era of multi-tasking. Her School 33 video installation, “Horror Vacui: Nature Abhors a Vacuum,” makes us ponder why we seek constantly to fill our minds with words, music, clatter, stuff.
Sachs thinks of film as painting. She painted, drew and wrote poetry as a teen-ager in Memphis, Tenn. But it was not until she was a history major at Brown University – and spent a year studying in Paris – that she discovered film as an art form. “When I found out people could use film in the same way as a paint brush, it just blew my mind,” says Sachs, who for three years has lived in Catonsville with her partner Mark Street, an associate professor in film at the University of Maryland Baltimore County. “I discovered the idea of being a ‘filmmaker,’ that it wasn’t about a crew and a director and a hierarchy of people.”
The artist’s work has appeared at the Museum of Modern Art and the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York and at the Delaware Museum of Art in Wilmington and has won awards at the New Jersey Film Festival, the Athens (Ohio) Film Festival, and the New York Film Expo.
Now Sachs, who this fall is teaching a video class at the Maryland Institute, College of Art, is working on a documentary, funded in part by the Maryland Humanities Council, about the Catonsville Nine, a pioneering group of protesters against the Vietnam War in 1968 came to be called.
Since 1998, when she began the project, she has been haunted, she says, by the story of Catholic priests Philip and Daniel Berrigan, who with seven other people went into a Catonsville draft board office, removed records and burned them in front of a crowd of reporters and onlookers. They were convicted and sentenced to prison.
When not working on the documentary, Sachs shoots other images incessantly, saving them, sometimes for years, until they begin to form patterns in her mind. “The idea for this installation didn’t evolve at once,” she says. “Part of being an experimental filmmaker is that you shoot all the time. It’s like a painting: You don’t know where you are going.”
A meaningful phrase
She heard the term “horror vacui” for the first time about a year ago. “It means fear of emptiness, or a compulsion to fill,” she says. The notion struck a chord.
“I wondered about my own restlessness. As an artist you have this compulsion to create all the time. And I wondered about being able to live with my own thoughts. I heard the words and I looked at this work I had been collecting and I realized this is something that I had been thinking about for almost a decade.”
Sachs has created a deceptively simple installation at School 33. Step behind a heavy black curtain and into a small, dimly lighted bedroom. At first glance, the installation seems to consist only of a bedroom and three ever-changing videos. Stay awhile. You will discover that a great deal is happening, some of it inside your own mind.
The walls and ceiling are white; the floor gray. A four-poster bed sits in front of a window. The bed’s white sheets and coverlet are turned down – ready for someone to retire for the night. Two chairs painted ghostly gray line the wall.
As you soak up your surroundings with its soft lighting, constantly moving images and shadows that flicker against the sparse furnishings – your mind wanders. On-screen images of ordinary household objects seem weirdly evocative. A duster complete with a bushy top of feathers begins to resemble a palm tree. A siren can be heard. Is that part of the installation, or the muffled sounds of real Baltimore?
Just what is real?
Sachs plays with this question: real or unreal? You are inside the white bedroom, shut away from the “real” world, yet everything here – bed, chairs, television set – is entirely familiar one minute and peculiar the next. You can look out the window, but it is really a video screen.
Through the window, an image appears of the artist performing mundane household activities: sweeping the floor, talking on the telephone, reading a newspaper, washing a window. Peer through this “window” to a point beyond her and you see an image of tree branches dancing in the breezes of a sunny summer day.
Sachs plays the role of producer, camera operator and actor. She filmed herself while watching her image on a monitor, choreographing her movements in reaction to the play of light and shadow and line. “I could watch myself as I did it so, just like when you are painting, you can change the paint or the brushstrokes, I was moving my body for graphic effect.” he says. “It is going back to still lifes. That is how I set it up.”
There also is an image above the real bed: that of a large, white bed. On one pillow, a crimson azalea flickers like a fragment of a dream. This image, the artist says, is “all about the lushness of the flowers, desire, and the empty pillow next to you.”
At the foot of the real bed, a small television sits atop a table. The black-and-white scenes on its screen have the eerie familiar/frightening qualities of film noir. With her camera, Sachs allows you to glimpse a lamp and its shadow, the edge of a telephone, the silhouette of a person reading a newspaper. Light and shadow change the arrangements of ordinary objects into painterly compositions.
The longer you stand inside the installation, the more your see, or think you see. Stare at the sheets of either of the beds – the one you can touch or the image of the bed on the wall – and you begin to notice how the light plays on the wrinkles in the sheets, or how shadows seem to form shapes on the pillow. A dialogue occurs between images. You occasionally see the artist reading a newspaper in the window as the shadow of a person reading a newspaper appears on the smaller television screen. “At times, these images are about specific things,” says Sachs. “At other times they are really about textures and light.”
No sounds of silence
Sound plays a role, too. As the images flicker, you hear crickets chirping, rain falling, cheerful voices, a pop song – noises that can be heard on a Baltimore summer evening. Sachs gives each sound equal weight: “It is as though the thunder has the same value as a pop song and as a child crying. It is more about the play between the sounds than the sounds themselves.
Percussive sounds, created by Baltimore composer and musician Tom Goldstein, are woven into the sound track. Goldstein watched the window several times, adding sounds, one by one, that correspond to particular gestures. Sachs says, “The piece has several layers of sound and yet it is really spare, which I really wanted. That was the challenge: To find real world sounds and sounds that are musical that work.”
But the magic of the installation occurs in the moments between these sounds. “The sounds in your head happen when there is no sound,” the artist says. “I would love it if someone sat down for awhile to think about the installation. I would love it if someone would lie down on the bed and just think.”
What would happen if you put down your newspaper right now and listened? You hear the rustle of paper, the clink of a coffee mug being placed on the kitchen table, a siren in the distance, the happy shrieks of a child next door, the rush of a shower running upstairs, the thump of a dog’s tail on the floor, the hum of a refrigerator, your breath.
The Commercial Appeal, Memphis, Friday March 31, 2000
Memphis Inspirations Come Home in Films by Two Sachses
By John Beifuss
This weekend’s Memphis International Film Festival will be a homecoming of sorts for brother-and-sister filmmakers Ira Sachs and Lynne Sachs.
“Ira and I, we’re in the same field, and that’s thrilling,” said Lynne, in a telephone interview this week from Baltimore, where she lives with her husband and two daughters. “But even though Memphis in a real sense is responsible for us getting into filmmaking, we have a totally different approach.”
Ira, 34, is earning recognition as a director of fiercely personal and uncompromised independent narrative films.
Lynne, 38, whose interest in film was fueled by a student job at the Center for Southern Folklore, is a creator of what she describes as “experimental” documentaries that merge “history and memory and the artistic gesture.”
“We both have sort of insider-outsider relationships with the city,” said Ira, who plans to return to Memphis this fall to shoot his second feature, Forty Shades of Blue, for executive producer Sydney Pollack, director of The Firm.
“I’m incredibly familiar with every shopping center and every liquor store and every new construction project, so it’s very real and intimate, but I haven’t lived here in 12 to 15 years,” said Ira, in a phone interview from his home in New York. “That outsider status allows me to come back to the city and look at it and try to understand it, and maybe see some things that people who live here don’t always notice.
Ira will be at Rhodes College on Saturday and Sunday to present screenings of three of his productions: Lady (1994), a 28-minute film focusing on a sexually ambiguous redhead; Vaudeville (1991), a 55-minute roundelay about a group of dysfunctional musical revue entertainers stranded overnight in small-town America, and The Delta, a critically acclaimed 1996 feature about the relationship between a privileged young Memphian and a mixed-race Vietnamese refugee.
Lynne won’t be in town, but the film festival will present two of her documentaries: the 33-minute Which Way Is East (1994), an autobiographical chronicle of a journey through Vietnam made in collaboration with her sister, Dana Sachs; and Sermons and Sacred Pictures (1989), a half-hour portrait of the late Rev. L.O. Taylor, a popular Baptist minister in Memphis who owned a movie camera and filmed baptisms and other events in the African-American community in the 1930’s and ‘40s.
The two Central High School graduates both return to Memphis from time to time to visit their mother, retired Rhodes College professor Diane Sachs. Their father, Ira Sachs Sr., now lives in Park City, Utah, site of the Sundance Film Festival, where, coincidentally, both The Delta and Which Way Is East have been screened.
“I think my dad gave us this spirit of jumping into situations and taking risks,” Lynne said, “And my mom had this sensitivity, and an appreciation of poetry and all things artistic.”
Ira and Lynne both credit their father with much of their movie education, however.
“We were children of divorce,” Ira said, “and I would say every weekend we went with my dad to the movies.”
Said Lynne: “That was the divorced dad thing to do – go to El Chico and have cheese dip and then go to the movies.”
Said Ira: “And that usually meant going to the movies he was interested in seeing – Serpico, Dog Day Afternoon, The Conversation, Death Wish.”
Lynne: “ He didn’t want to see The Love Bug.”
Ira: “I still feel like ‘70s films are the best, and a lot of that I think is because I had pretty organic reactions to those movies when I was a kid.”
The Malco Highland Quartet wasn’t the only influence on the future career of the siblings, however, Ira learned about acting, producing and dramatization as a student involved in the Park Commission-sponsored Memphis Children’s Theater, “the only truly integrated environment I’ve ever been in in my whole life. I still think of it as this magical place where because we were all kids and we were all doing theater together, there was this real sense of community.”
Lynne, meanwhile, was exposed to landmark motion pictures like Mr. Hulto’s Holiday when longtime city schools teacher Lore Hisky formed a film society at Central High. Lynne had always written poetry and painted, but she began to feel that film was “a place where I could put all of these passions together.”
In the early 1980s, Lynne got a job at the Center for Southern Folklore, and one of her first assignments was to catalog about 15 hours of film footage photographed by Rev. Taylor and donated to the center by his widow, Blanche Taylor.
“That place had a big impact on me,” Lynne said of the currently homeless Center. “I never even knew that film could have such an impact and be so oriented toward the community.”
Lynne became fascinated by the silent footage of these “Taylor Made Productions,” as hand-lettered title cards called the works. She learned that Taylor would travel from church to church and show his short films to eager crowds, who enjoyed seeing themselves and their neighbors without ever considering that what they were looking at would prove to be rare and invaluable historical footage of the Memphis black community.
Taylor became “my main inspiration as a filmmaker. I shoot almost everything myself, and he did, too. He had this total immersion in the making of his films, and that’s how I work,” said Lynne, who said it takes her about two years to finish one of her short films.
Lynne’s other “filmic discourses” include such nonfiction aural-and-visual collages as A Biography of Lilith (1997), described as “an evocative meditation” on “Judaism and patriarchal history”; The House of Science: a museum of false facts (1991), “a new feminized film form” that explores “art and science’s representation of women, combining home movies, personal remembrances, staged scenes and found footage”; and Blasted Into Consciousness (1984), which uses news clippings to examine a group rape in Fall River, Mass.
Needless to say, you won’t find these works on the shelves at Blockbuster Video. But they have carried Lynne to festivals, screenings, seminars and teaching jobs at the Art Institute of Chicago, Temple University, the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Sydney Film Festival in Australia, to name just a few locations.
Which Way Is East, in fact, recently was screened during a prestigious program at the Whitney Museum in New York titled “The American Century: Art and Culture 1900-2000.” Reports Lynne: “There were seven people in the audience. Who goes to museums on a Wednesday afternoon?”
Lynne’s current project is The Catonsville Nine, a documentary look at what has happened to the two women and seven men in a Catholic activist group in Baltimore who went to a local draft office in 1968, grabbed hundreds of Selective Service records, took them outside to a parking lot and burned them with napalm. All of them went to prison for up to three years for this act of protest against the Vietnam War.
Ira, meanwhile, is working on he casting of Forty Shades of Blue, from a script he and co-writer Michael Rohatyn developed last year at Robert Redford’s Sundance Writers Lab.
Ira described Blue as the story of a woman in her mid-30s who lives with “an older man who’s a rock and roll legend – sort of a cross between Sam Phillips and Jim Dickinson, but a real boozer and a womanizer.” The focus is on “the woman you always see in the movies but the story never really looks at. She’s on the arm of the wealthy man, but she’s over to the side. She’s the blond. Not the powerful masculine center, but the woman on the periphery.”
Like his sister, Ira has a very impressive resume, with press clippings that include a laudatory two-page review of The Delta (now available on VHS from Strand Home Video) by Newsweek’s David Ansen, who called the extremely low-budget work “the most memorable film in competition at Sundance” in 1997. In addition, Ira’s films have been screened at festivals around the world; and he was the recipient of a Rockefeller Foundation Grant for Media Artists,
And all of that will earn you less money than directing Leprechaun in the Hood. “The difficult thing is to keep making films,” Ira said. “The Delta was helpful for establishing me with a certain identity in the professional world, but you can’t make a career out of films like The Delta. You have to try to bridge the distance between being independent and being commercial. Sydney Pollack being involved in Forty Shades of Blue was a great moment. He really loved the scripts and saw what could be done with it.”
As for the third Sachs child: Dana’s only film project was Which Way is East, but the 37-year-old sibling is awaiting the release this year of her first book, The House on Dream Street: A Memoir of Hanoi, to be published by Algonquin Press.
Window Work by Lynne Sachs 9 minute, color, sound video 2000
Music by Tom Goldstein Sound Recording by Mark Street
A woman drinks tea, washes a window, reads the paper– simple tasks that somehow suggest a kind of quiet mystery within and beyond the image. Sometimes one hears the rhythmic, pulsing symphony of crickets in a Baltimore summer night.. Other times jangling toys dissolve into the roar of a jet overhead, or children tremble at the sound of thunder. These disparate sounds dislocate the space temporally and physically from the restrictions of reality. The small home-movie boxes within the larger screen are gestural forms of memory, clues to childhood, mnemonic devices that expand on the sense of immediacy in her “drama.” These miniature image-objects represent snippets of an even earlier media technology — film. In contrast to the real time video image, they feel fleeting, ephemeral, imprecise.
“A picture window that looks over a magically realistic garden ablaze in sunlight fills the entire frame. In front, a woman reclines while secret boxes filled with desires and memories, move around her as if coming directly out of the screen.” Helen DeWitt, “Thresholds of the Frame”, Tate Modern Museum of Contemporary Art, London
“On screen images of ordinary objects seem weirdly evocative. A duster complete with a bushy top of feathers begins to resemble a palm tree. You will discover that a great deal is happening, some of it inside your own mind. The magic of the piece occurs in the moments between sounds.” “Art Portfolio”, The Baltimore Sun, Holly Selby
Dallas Video Festival; Delaware Art Museum Biennial; Athens Film Fest; European Media Arts Festival, Osnabruck, Germany; New York Film Expo; Black Maria Director’s Citation; Moscow Film Festival; Tate Modern, London
We’d love to regale you with faerie tales of how things all came together, on time (ahead of time, even), how all we really did was make a few phone calls, watch a few films, and a festival just materialized.
But we’d be lying.
Rather, ours is more of a cautionary tale: a tempest-tossed sea filled with missed classes, empty gallons of midnight oil, and countless abandoned bodies in our wake. Yet somewhere, in the debris of our madness, from the ashes rose the phoenix of this week’s festival, which we proudly present to you. Pay no attention to the trio of lunatics who linger in the shadows, turn your eyes to the screen. These shows are for you: the audience, the filmmakers, the world.
“New Experimental Film Works”
at the Fells Point Creative Alliance. Baltimore, Maryland
Presented by Lynne Sachs and Mark Street
Thursday – December 9, 1999
From Ann Arbor to Austin to Arcata, local fimmakers Mark Street and Lynne Sachs have been travelling to film festivals around the country and in Europe this year showing their own work and watching an amazing selection of new alternative cinema. Tonight they will bring back to Baltimore some of the most compelling, ground-breaking experimental films being made in America today. A surreal allegory on a Canadian farm, a meditation on Cuban streetlife, an Eastern European tease on the notion of history– the work is audacious, lyrical and on occasion sublime. Two of the filmmakers — Paula Froehle (Chicago) and Jenny Perlin (New York City) — will attend their Baltimore premieres in order to discuss their work and to answer questions from the audience.
“Chemistries”, Daven Gee, 10 min.
“Meditations on Revolution, Part I” by Robert Fenz, 10 min.
“The Whole History of That” by Jenny Perlin, 17 min.
“We are Going Home” by Jennifer Reeves, 10 min.
“Fever” by Paul Froehle, 6 min.
“Flight” by Greta Snider, 7 min.
“Twilight Psalm II: Walking Distance” by Phil Solomon, 15min.
—————————————————————————
DIS PLACE MENT:
5 States of UnBelonging
LINK Film and Video Program
March 31, 2000
Curated by Mark Street and Lynne Sachs
“Fells Point 99”, Isaac Cynkar, 1999
(4 min. excerpt)
“Sight Unseen (a travelog)”, Jonathan Robinson, 1990
(5 min. excerpt)
“Land Without Bread”, Luis Bunuel, 1932
(6 min. excerpt)
“Mercy”, Abigail Child, 1989
(3 min. excerpt)
“The Past is a Foreign Country”, Joanna Racynskza, 1998
(5 min. excerpt)
Host What we’re going to start off. Film reviews with Reina Collins here. And then we’re going to be talking about the death of the Notorious B.I.G. The rapper assassinated, basically, 24 years old. Find out what that means to us pop culture. First of all, good morning to Reina Collins.
Reina Collins Good morning, Chris.
Host How are you?
Reina Collins I’m doing terrific.
Host And you’ve brought in two media victims, I see
Reina Collins Two medium victims. (laughs) Well, I guess, yes. We have guests in the studio, a.k.a. guests in the studio. I wanted to talk about two things today. The first one is, you know, believe it or not, there are film festivals for almost everything in the Bay area. There’s the International Film Festival, there’s the Jewish Film Festival, there’s the Asian American Film Festival, which just ended, there was a very small German film festival. And all of those festivals each year get bigger. There is only one festival that is tried maybe five different times in different permutations to start, and has never really gone off the ground. And that’s some kind of women’s film festival, and it’s really interesting. I’m not exactly sure why that is. But but it’s happened in many different ways. And so I was really excited when I found out that there’s yet another attempt to start a women’s film festival, and it’s, as I think they’re optimistic, too, because they even call it the first annual mad Cat Women’s Film and Video Festival. And with me to talk about the film festival are the two directors, Ariel Ben Dov and Holen Kahn. And, as well as we’re joined by one of the filmmakers who is actually now in New York, who has a film in the film festival, Lynne Sachs. So I want to welcome all of you. And the first thing is, what inspired you at this point to yet again, try to do something that for some reason or another, hasn’t succeeded before.
Ariella Ben-Dov Well, I think partially Reina it came from just that reason that, we had heard that there hadn’t been that much support of women’s endeavors. There is no women’s bookstore. There hasn’t been a women’s film festival, in a long time. And I think we wanted to take a really bold look at that. And, figure out why and find a way to change that and find a festival that both did, highlight women’s visions, but also highlighted really extraordinary films, films that were very exciting, films that were very different than what was being shown in the gay and lesbian and the Asian American and the International Film Festival and really find a very new approach that might have, a chance to really take hold in the Bay area because it brought something new to the film circuit here.
Host Well, and that’s that’s the question there. It’s not that there are not women and women’s films in all of these other festivals. So how is this festival different from other festivals?
Holen Kahn I think we’re really focusing on films that are, not mainstream, not, straight forward in, their use of the medium. These films are really challenging uses of sound and image and the way that those two meld together. And you’ll see that from, you know, we’re showing films by Barbara Hammer, we’re showing films by, a new filmmaker, Kate Hogg. We’re showing films by Sarah Kennedy, a local filmmaker, and they’re really films that, have not been highlighted and have not had a chance to have a forum to be seen in the Bay area and internationally.
Host So these films are intellectually challenging for one. But also, I notice that a lot of the films are short and, you know, partly, partly that’s just the fact that there’s a lot of experimental type films that are short. But the other part is that I it makes me wonder about resources that women have to make films. Did you notice, when you were gathering selections? And it seems like most of them are shorter films?
Ariella Ben-Dov Yeah, I would definitely say that, especially in the, in the US, there’s less women making feature films that…
Host Wait a minute, the most advanced country in the world!
Ariella Ben-Dov One of the least funded categories for the arts. So fortunately, unlike and, Europe, there is, I think, more feature length films being done by women. Probably more feature length films being done in general of, good quality. But, we did receive mainly shorts, received some features. But there’s definitely, in the experimental realm, probably, an emphasis on shorts that it’s not necessary to make something two hours, to bring forth your aesthetic and your ideas and that these are films that really have a great deal to say within a very small amount of time. And that’s kind of incredible in that way, and that they, and you can we were able to curate programs where 5 or 6 films could build a two hour program that was really interconnected and really interesting to see that in five different people look at similar things in very different ways.
Holen Kahn and they really complement each other. I think that’s what we tried to do with these programs is find films that complement, challenge each other so that we can, you know, really, engage our audience and allow them to question what they’re saying, get involved, sort of break that barrier barrier between maker and viewer and really, you know, have some sort of interaction. I think that’s also why we encourage a lot of filmmakers to come and present their work and answer questions and give feedback. And, that’s also why we’ve created panel discussions, which will be on, Saturday and Sunday morning so that we can really, engage our audiences to, to be active during our festival.
Reina Collins Well, it’s interesting that, you know, for the films that you chose, you actually chose these small films and put them together. But when it comes to the panel discussions, I mean, one of the panels is about, basically new dimensions, divisions, women and media in the 21st century. I mean, that’s, that’s, you know, that’s summit, right? That’s not a panel. So it seems to me that you’re being pulled in two different directions, both wanting to come up with very sort of concrete programs that really select some kind of poetic momentum. But at the same time, you’re trying to answer very broad questions. Well, I think the there…
Lynne Sachs Reina?
Reina Collins Oh, just just a second. We’re joined here on the phone by Lynne Sachs.
Lynne Sachs Well, I had just to, comment about that because I, I agree that that’s a really, a broad topic, but I also think that one of the things that’s really interesting for us to contemplate in terms of time, and it also sort of comes out of a word that you used calling us. What was it, media victims and your, your studio, is is this issue of Women’s History Month, which is going on right now in March. And so some people resist that idea of ghettoization or, or, you know, is there a need, you know, almost into the 20th century for this kind of focus? And I think it doesn’t come out of a, a defensiveness or, or a need to, to, especially in San Francisco, say that these films are never seen, but it means that there’s a whole dialog going on with the kind of intensity that comes to these films from a different perspective, or maybe a shared perspective and that, you know, I want it to me, one of the biggest issues is how long will we need such festivals? Or maybe we will always need them because they create a new kind of fabric on which to for people to sit and share ideas. And, so I kind of think that the broadness of, of a panel such as, you know, looking at the 21st century isn’t so much, are we going to get lost in the 20th century, or can we make bigger, longer films? But just to keep a sort of, complexity of the way that we, come to our work and keep it going and, and don’t necessarily strive for certain kinds of, goals that perhaps, have been thrown to us like, well, one day you’ll make a feature film and then you’ll and you’ll then fit into a formula.
Reina Collins Well, let me introduce you before we go on, because Lynne Sachs is a filmmaker, and a couple of her films are actually in the film festival, and currently she’s living in New York and has had a lot of experience making both experimental films. But films that have a very strong narrative structure to them and sound is an important element, which as a radio person, I really appreciate. So. And you were about to say something or..
Lynne Sachs I’m sorry I interrupted.
Ariella Ben-Dov About the panels?
Reina Collins Yeah.
Ariella Ben-Dov Yeah. No. That’s fine. Hi, Lynne. Yeah, I just, I think that we we gave it such a broad scope because we really wanted people like Lynne, who’s on on that panel, as well as Barbara Hammer and Gene Finley and the Kennedy to really bring up their own experiences and to use their visions because it is about new vision and new directions, and that can be a very small topic or can be a very large general topic. And it’s, it’s broad, it’s opened up by these, these women’s experiences and the way that they see their futures and the films that they plan to make and what they’ve come from before and their influences. And I think that’s something that will come across.
Reina Collins Well, Lynne, I wanted to talk to you about your films that are going to be in the film festival. One of them, Which way is East: notebooks from Vietnam, which is a film that you made with your sister. You went on a tour of Vietnam with your sister right now, the, the thing that’s very interesting to me about it, besides the fact that I just went to Vietnam, is is the fact that you were an observer in another culture where your sister was actually living and you were making a film for an audience that’s here. And in some ways, that raises many of the questions that I think are addressed in different ways in the film festival. So talk about your film and relationship to those kinds of issues.
Lynne Sachs Oh, that’s a wonderful question. It’s very provocative. First of all, I wanted to say that, I think that, the film is very much from the perspective of two women, but also two sisters and two sisters who see a place and perhaps see history in very different ways. So we come from this shared space of shared home, origins, education, whatever. But then there’s this, there’s this split which has to do with first impressions. And when you this sort of perhaps, obvious and maybe superficial questions that one asks in the very beginning when one arrives, especially in Vietnam, you bring this baggage, so to speak. And, and she had a sort of a totally different kind of sensitivity because she’d been there for a couple of years, and it was a sensitivity to things like the changing of the seasons or foods or what some people do. I’m not claiming this call a kind of feminine perspective, because it’s maybe more domestic, or maybe it’s connected to children’s lives or connected to certain kinds of experiences that women have, that men have as well. Of course, that we come to these things and from different places. And, it’s very much a conversation between the two of us. And, there’s a lot of resistance. There’s a way there’s a point in the film that where we both talk about photography, in particular, and I have this commitment to sort of, collecting, capturing, which are awful terms. And she has this, this resistance to, to doing that at all, but just sort of taking it in and, and so it’s a lot it’s a film that’s very much about travel and very much about how we have a shared, what I call, horizon line with people and with Vietnamese, particularly Vietnamese of my generation, the 30s. And, we have a shared horizon, but we see it and from very different perspectives. So, that’s kind of how the, the film work and it’s hard to say how it fits into a, like a women’s program, except that, it’s very much our perspective. And, and at the time that I was there, which was in 92, there were so many, returning soldiers, and so they brought a very different set of expectations.
Host Reina Collins, I’m I’m curious, you said that this this film that, that Lynne and the filmmaker just described, Lynne Sachs. Typified for you sort of what the theme of this whole, film festival is the Mad Cat Women’s Film and Video Festival. Next weekend at the Roxy, in in San Francisco, that it was bringing things from another place to show the people at home or something like women are a foreign country. Is that what you meant? What did you mean by that? That was very intriguing.
Reina Collins Well, I think that, you know, as somebody who reviews films, who are both both documentary films as well as feature films, that that there’s certain images that we see over time that we see over and over again. And in some ways, you know, I’ll talk about a film and you say, well, I saw a film about that. And that was in 1953. You know, here they are thinking about remaking The Women, and the women is a perfect example, where it’s these women gathered together. And what do they talk about? Men, that’s all they talk about the whole film. So.
Host And all the jealousies and competition.
Reina Collins Yes. That’s right. You remember that film and.
Host Oh, yeah!
Reina Collins So now most of the films we have, there aren’t many characters that are women in them. And if they are, what are they doing? You know, there’s the other woman, you know, there’s certain roles that we see.
Host Stereotypes, mhm.
Reina Collins Yes, they are. And so what I think the hard part about experimental films is, is that we’re not used to either experiencing different kinds of images or having to kind of think and respond to those images. So I think some of them are very hard to watch and some of them are different for, somebody who’s really used to a very simple narrative structure to watch. But, other ones, I think anybody could see and say, well, that’s not experimental. That just feels like this reflection of my life. So I think that there’s a wide range. So what I what the film festival, as somebody who hasn’t seen the films in the film festival, but from reading about it seems to be trying to integrate those things so that people can get different ideas and look at things differently. Now, some of them might be sort of unacceptable, some of them might be boring, but some of them might be incredibly intriguing and fascinating because you’re looking at something in a different way. As you know, if you haven’t gone to festivals that focus on those kinds of films.
Host Now, I’m tempted to ask Holen and Ariella which films are the boring ones, but I won’t do that. (laughs)
Reina Collins Well, the thing is,
Holen Kahn None of them!
Host And the thing is, it might be boring to you, but it might not be boring to me or to everybody since they’re talking about personal reflections. I mean, you might be able to hear 20 poems on love and other people might say another poem, on love?
Holen Kahn You know, some of them might be less accessible. I wouldn’t say any of them are boring. I’d say that it might make you feel uncomfortable. They might make you feel confused. They might make you, you know, put you in a quandary of some sort.
Host But now Holen Kahn you have a film and in this festival, what? And the filmmaker will be in person, Holen Kahn and, this is, Sunday the 23rd, 7 p.m. you’re part of a program with, an Australian woman’s film. Your film has, basically a misquote from Gilbert and Sullivan. What is your film about? Your grandmother?
Holen Kahn It is about my grandmother, who I never knew, she died before I was born. And it’s really about reconstructing identity and how we pass on stories and folklore and genetics. It’s about the fears of breast cancer and, and violence and and, and love and desire and how all of these things interconnect and how they informed my grandmother’s life and therefore how they inform my life and kind of how our choices have changed over the last 70 years and kind of coming of age in the 1920s versus coming of age and the 1970s, you know, in the or 80s. And, it really it was amazing because it’s all constructed through archival footage that my grandparents took from 1929 to 1952 and watching these films…
Host Wonderful they had that.
Holen Kahn And yeah, and learning their lives, really, and manipulating their lives in many ways. It was an incredible experience, and I think I actuallyReina really captured it when she said that these are films about experiencing. And I think that these films are experiential even, you know, and that they’re really about, they are about challenging the viewer into thinking about their reactions and their interpretations of image and sound. And I, I tried to really do that in my film. It’s it’s heavily layered sound and, it’s about how we perceive things. And I think a lot of the films are like that, that some of them are much more straightforward and some of them really are very accessible. There are pieces that are narrative that are just really well told stories, beautifully done. Other ones are much more visual, like extraordinarily visual and, really hold you on the edge of your seat trying to make way through the images. They’re like puzzles that you put together, and they’re very exciting as you as you place the pieces.
Host And speaking to the conscious, the subconscious, the unconscious, they’re all these very subtle layers that these things could all be calling to and making various people comfortable or uncomfortable as a result.
Reina Collins Well, that actually raises a question. Lynne, your new film, A Biography of Lilith, talks about how verbal language, doesn’t really deal with what’s going on, and you’re trying to figure out another way to present the information in the material. You know, when I think of trying to organize a film like that, I just think, well, that’s kind of an overwhelming task because there’s so much that could be said. How did you how did you conceptualize what you were trying to do with that film?
Lynne Sachs Well, that film, is, it started off with a myth, which is all oral history. And then it went into it’s a piece of Jewish mysticism. And so it’s very much about text. But then again, the text was so limited and in a lot of ways, and I was interested in the way that the story of Lilith, who was Adam’s first partner before Eve, she was thrown out of the garden because she wanted to be on top in sex. That’s basically all that’s written. But then there was so much about the story that has traveled again, through through time and through culture, and not necessarily only Jewish. Babylonian Aramaic was found all over the place. So, what I did, I it’s a it’s my first musical and it’s full of, experimentations with, opera singers and, there’s a the group, Charming Hostess in Berkeley did a couple of pieces like, for the film they wrote.
Reina Collins and, of course, immediately me, hearing (sings) “I enjoy being you know, girl”
Lynne Sachs But, well, it’s kind of a musical, but it’s also very much more ephemeral than that. But I say it’s a musical because it’s full of all original music. So it’s kind of like working with words and you hear words, but then you don’t quite pick it up because it’s mostly like bits of snatches of, of poetry. And then that film, actually, I could never say it was either a documentary, a narrative, or experimental because it’s absolutely all three. It’s a woman playing Lilith, and it’s her life revealed in a sort of documentary way. And then it’s full of strange images. It’s just spiders and jellyfish.
Reina Collins So that sounds, you know, really interesting. And I think in some ways that sums up maybe what you’re trying to do with the Mad Cat women’s film and video. First of all, it runs March 21st, 22nd and 23rd at the Roxy Theater in San Francisco, which is at 16th and Valencia. And if you want information and programs, you can call (415) 339-8170. That’s (415) 339-8170 for the Mad Cat women’s Film and Video Festival. I want to thank all three of you for joining me. Lynne Sachs on the phone. And then we also have Ariella Ben-Dov and Holen Kahn and many interesting films coming up.
Host Thank you, Reina, for, bringing this all to our attention. And good luck. The first annual…